Home Home Initiatives Comments Insight Publications Correspondence Search Resources Profiles Upcoming

 


 


 


 

Labour

Justice

Economic & Social Policy

Foreign & Military Affairs
Belfer Center for International Affairs
Canadian Security Intelligence Service
Center for Applied Studies in International Negotiations
Center for Strategic & International Studies
Central Intelligence Agency
Council on Foreign Relations
International Institute for Strategic Studies
Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies
Jane's Intelligence Review
National Security Agency
Nuremberg Principles
Royal Institute of International Affairs
Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies
United Nations Watch
Washington Institute for Near East Policy

Think Tanks
Brookings Institution
Center for National Policy
Hudson Institute
National Policy Association
Rand Institute


A Political Mugging

The Politics of<br>Canada's Nixon
Mugging3.jpg
 

Beryl P. Wajsman

1 November 2005


I wasn’t named for blame in the Gomery Report. I received no Section 13 letter. So I guess if they can’t get you one way they try another. I am now one of ten people “banned for life” from the Liberal Party. A party that I am not even a member of.

Under it’s current leadership it is almost a compliment. No one even knows if this is legal, but I guess it sure makes a good sound bite.

 

There is very little “liberal” about this Liberal administration. Well, as President Harry Truman said, “If you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen.” We’re going to stay in the kitchen. We’re going to pursue social justice. And we are going to commit the same “crimes” of criticizing this government when it curtails basic privacy rights and compromises due process of law with McCarthyite witch-hunts.

 

It is time for Canadians to wake up to the near Stalinist statocratic government we have that can abridge the most basic freedom of a citizen in a free society. That of political affiliation and assembly. That is what this government has tried to do. It will fail. It will fail just as other governments have failed that have crossed the line and incurred the people’s wrath. Nixon had his “enemies list”. We now have a Canadian Nixon.

 

It is timely that George Clooney’s movie on the battles between famed reporter Edward R. Murrow and Sen. Joseph McCarthy entitled “Good Night and Good Luck” is opening on movie screens across the country this week. Timely because it reminds all citizens of what can happen when the instruments of state are used to destroy a person’s character through innuendo, rumour and hearsay. Murrow won his battle with McCarthy. But it raises the troubling questions of what protections can be afforded ordinary citizens from the encroachments on their rights who do not have access to any voice. At the heart of what we now call McCarthyism was nothing more than political brinkmanship played before a national television audience to settle political scores and raise McCarthy’s image. He was finally brought down by a simple sentence from Boston attorney Joseph N. Welch who had had enough. He asked of McCarthy, “Senator, have you no shame. Have you no decency left?”

 

Canadians need to ask the same question of this government because there are even greater dangers to civil liberties lurking around the corner. At an Institute conference a Member of Parliament once characterized Canada as a “controlled democracy”.  Today, Canada may well be on the road to becoming a terrorizing democracy institutionalizing a culture of victimization and fear. Over the past few weeks the federal government has announced that it will proceed with several initiatives that to this writer put the lie to the image of a just and transparent society we  like to peddle to the world.

 

Next month the Martin government will bring forward legislation allowing for the monitoring of e-mail and internet communications. The bill would force providers of internet and telephone services to duplicate records of their clients’ activities and require, on simple request, that the information be passed on to police authorities. The proposal demands that network capacity be constructed to allow for tapping of some 8,000 individuals at any one time. Federal Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has told Justice Minister Irwin Cotler that the law would allow security authorities to access more information about Canadians’ personal lives than ever before. Yet Ottawa remains strangely silent on consideration of any judicial safeguards and oversight even in light of the fact that current evidentiary requirements for standard wiretaps have already become flimsy and shallow.

 

The federal Liberals have also gone on record as being committed to proceeding with Bill C-17, the Marijuana Decriminalization legislation, and with Bill C-53, the Proceeds of Crime act. Though legalization, not just decriminalization, of marijuana is long overdue, the problem of C-17 is that it also allows for random stopping of motorists to check for drugs without any necessity of probable cause as exists in the United States. C-53, which seeks to allow the government to seize any assets obtained through illegal means, also has within it the reversal of burden of proof.

 

Unlike even the RICO statute in the U.S. or the “Guerin” law in Ireland, the Proceeds of Crime Bill would make certain accused guilty until proven innocent turning hundreds of years of civil liberties protections on its head.

 

The new initiatives announced by Ottawa follow in the wake of the giant databases being created by the CCRA which has repeatedly refused to limit its use to anti-terrorism measures as requested by Canada’s privacy commissioner and civil-rights advocates such as former solicitor-general Warren Allmand. They follow in the wake of current Canadian Security Establishment monitoring of some 25% of all land line calls and 50% of cell calls with some 20% of these being sent to  the National Security Agency in Washington for transcription. They follow in the wake of the forthcoming biometric national identity cards. They follow in the wake of the proposal to put electronic security anklets on suspects who have not even been charged. And finally, they follow in the wake of the government looking at empowering a host of regulatory functions to be made by Order-In- Council without the approval or consent of Parliament.

 

It is time to turn the timidity of Canadians around. A timidity that has led to obsequious obedience when Federal Ministers corrode a citizen’s reputation in open pronouncements; when the RCMP raids a reporter’s home in violation of a judge’s order; when Revenue departments compromise longstanding privacy protections on taxpayers files through information exchange with other departments and other levels of government; when CRTC judgments decide what words we are allowed to hear and what images we are allowed to see.

 

All these matters, if allowed to go unchallenged, will set precedents that will open the door to practices that exist in other societies where state authorities routinely compromise anyone of interest on any pretext. And these issues cannot just be the subject of court challenges. They take too long and damage done cannot be undone. They need to be challenged with the full panoply of weapons including the law, the media and a vigorous public advocacy that threatens to expose what the 18th century legal philosopher Becarria called “… this tyranny of the mindless…” and arrest this triumphant march of the mediocre.

 

Ottawa must be made to recognize the inherent right of every citizen to an equal claim of presumptive tolerance from the state. That each member of a free society has as a birthright, in Lord Acton’s words, to the “…equity of just consideration…”. This government has been systematically abrogating that birthright. Law cannot be continually used, and abused, as a two-edged sword of craft and oppression. It must become the staff of the honest and the shield of the innocent. Elected officials cannot be allowed to marginalize its citizens without restraint of consequence.

 

We are a society of laws and not of men. But when bad men make bad laws, or when unprincipled officials compromise good ones, then it is time, as Gandhi said, to stand up and exercise “responsible agitation” to stop governments from “…staggering drunkenly from wrong to wrong in order to protect their own immortality…” Let us never become so falsely pious that we forget that today’s laws are merely the limits on our actions placed by those in power who profited from a yesteryear when these laws did not exist, and now seek to protect their own gains by limiting access for others.

 

The heart of the matter is whether we can afford to sit idly by while this nation continues the restriction and reversion of rights that has been it’s hallmark over the past several decades, or whether we will chart a return to the proper course for this land, that of meeting a liberal democracy’s primordial obligation of protecting and expanding the amount of liberty and dignity which all human beings have a right to expect.

 

It is clear why the United Nations named Canada as one of the most invasive and intrusive governments in the liberal west. It is high time to tell the statocratic control freaks on the Rideau that enough is enough.

 

Today the victim was me. If we do not act, tomorrow it could be you. And our epitaph as a country will be that used by Murrow in one of his concluding programs on McCarthyism, “The fault dear Brutus lies not in the stars, but in ourselves.”

 

-30-

 

 

 

 

 

 



Email Article Format for Printing
Home Initiatives Comments Insight Publications Profiles Resources Search Correspondence


Le rapport Payette

Un autre affront à la liberté d'expression

Payette

Quebec report would submit journalists to state controls

Theodore Bikel

The soundtrack of our lives

MONTRÉAL

Freer,fairer,richer
Plus libre, plus juste,
plus riche

The Métropolitain

First Anniversary
Premier anniversaire

The Israel Apartheid Lies

A response to hate

Stimulate This!

Some permanent solutions to
a continuing crisis

RFK

"A tiny ripple of hope..."

Eternal Vigilance

Un appel aux citoyens engagés

Masada shall not fall again!

The legacy of the brave and the bold

To Rouse The World From Fear

The Legacy of JFK

Lewis MacKenzie, OC
The People's General

Going Big! Going Bold! Getting it Done!

Ardent Advocacy
The Pursuit of the Politics of Purpose

Pragmatic Radicalism and the Struggle for a
Civil Society

The Compulsion of Nonconformist Conscience

To Revive Militant Liberalism and Renew a Culture of Compassion

"Victory In Spite of All Terror"

A Policy to Vanquish
the Venom

WIESENTHAL

"And the Sun Stood Still at Mid-Day"

Twelve Days That Should Rend Our Souls Asunder

The Fierce Urgency of Now

John Paul II

A Ministry of Compassion for the
Victims of Contempt

Blind Justice in the Shadow of Life

The Tragedy of
Terri Schiavo

Mandatory Minimums

Rigorous Law
Rigorous Injustice

The Jaywalker, The Smoker and the Motherless Child

Our Bulls of Pamplona Run Amok

What we're for

Reflections on accomodation

Kafka, Kanada and Khodorkovsky

The Ghosts of
Dorian Gray

The David Irving Prosecution

The Perils of Divisible Freedoms

Harper's Triumph at the Summit

Principle Trumps Pandering

Scorn a Deluded People

Multiculturalism,Political Correctness,Moral Equivalency and the Coming Collapse of this Northern Dominion

The Shapiro Affair

A Commissioner Worthy of Contempt or a Culture Beneath Contempt?

Why Harper Won

A Victory of Character over Connivance

Liberal Renewal: A Time to Propose Not Merely Oppose

Toward a Return to Radical Liberalism

Decision Canada

A Flock of Sheep or a Pride of Lions

Canada's Nixon

Paul Martin and the Death of Canadian Liberalism

Subversion of Consequence, Perversion of Justice

Mulroney,Chretien,Martin and the Theft of a Country

Ottawa's Illiberal Agenda

The Compromise of Individual Imperative

A Legacy of Stone

The Martin-Stronach Deal

State Rape

The Scandal of Public Intrusions into
Private Lives

Extreme Prejudice: State Rape and the Death of Due Process

Our Retreat From Reason

Without Restraint of Consequence

The Rev. Darryl Gray and Our Culture of Complicity

Vertu et prohibition
Virtue and Vice

De confiner la vertu de liens raisonnables
The Self-Abnegation of the New Prohibitionists

Fatal Delusions

Culture,Immigration and the Compromise of Canadian Consequence

Exclusiveness and Intolerance

Religious Sacraments and Secular Rights

State and Faith

To Guard Against the Low Limitation of Narrow Narcissims

The Kirpan Decision

The Supremes Fail Again

The Tsunami Absolution

Empathy To Human Fate,
Apathy Toward
Human Hate

To Move A Nation

A Reflection on Leadership

Promises to Keep

The Unbearable Lightness of our
National Political Elites

A Nation Defined

Perspectives On
The Charter

A More Perfect Dominion

Time for the Canadian Republic

On Civil Conservatism

The Restraint of Reason Over Illiberal License

Neither Indulgence of Excuse Nor Excess of License

The Urgency for an Engaged Citizenry

Saudi Chutzpah and Jihadi Jigs

No Threat to the Real "Lords of War"

UN Watch

A Lesson in Law for Louise

The United Nations

30 Years of
"Brutal Buffoonery"

Lebanon Shares Hezbollah's Guilt

Lebanese Officials are Complicit

The Temper of
Our Time

A World Turned
Upside Down

Wake Up Calls From A Dangerous Time Zone

The Inherent Appeasement of
Moral Equivalency

Terms of Engagement

To Be Unreasonable
But Right

Québec & Israel

Contre la doctrine du mépris

Canada's Shame

The Victory of Shrivelled Spirit and Hostile Heart

Canada's Shame II

The Jamal Akkal Affair and our Foreign Policy Hypocrisy

Assadourian
& Al-Sudais

A Conflict of
Canadian Interests

Canada's Foreign Policy Review

A Chance at
Redemptive Change

The Institute for Public Affairs of Montreal

A Pledge of Principles

"...And Justice For All...": The Case for Fiscal Equity and Equality

An End to "Them That Has, Keeps"

Corporate Governance and Accountability:

Combinations of Institutional Intimacies and Concentrations of Unnatural Profits

Globalization and the Rights of Man

Labor's New
Crown of Thorns

“Evidence of Innocence is Irrelevant": The Death Penalty and the Illinois Experiment

The Fallibility of
Human Judgment

The Criminal Justice System: The Crimes of Punishment

The Crying Need for Legal, Penal and Parole Reform

The Quebec Election

A Transition Not a Transformation

A Matter of Prejudice

Quebec Shouldn't Accomodate
Quebec Should Acculturate

The Second Fall of Quebec Inc.

Time for an Untranquil Revolution

To Withstand Comparisons

The Challenge to Boisclair's Sovereigntists

The Colavecchio Affair

Our Ongoing Ordeal
With Civility

Quebec's Call for Clarity

What the Federal Election Results from Quebec Mean for Canada

Time to Fight
Fire with Fire

An End to the Blackmail

Hamas

The Holocaust Day Election

An Orgy of Hate: The Disgrace of Prejudice

An Open Letter to the Ministers of Justice and Immigration of Canada

To Revive Our
Courage to Loathe

An End to the Paralysis
of the Rational

A View from Amman

Or How Not to
Read the Signs

Brit Academics
Boycott Israel

Brit Proctologists
Throw Party

Re-Grinding
Avnery's Axe

The Truth of Today's Middle East Realities

The Hariri Assassination

The United Nations Condemns Syria

The Hijacking of Legacy

Irrational Theocracy, Irresponsible Theology

After Arafat: Perils and Prospects in the
Middle East

The Strategic Realities of Asymmetrical Polarization

Les masques tombent

Les enlèvements des deux journalistes français

Islamic Iconography: One Faith, One State

The Inevitable Confrontation
with the West

Les lendemains de la guerre

Vers une démocratie ou un morcellement de l’Irak ?

American Democrat Not American Caesar

The Bush Doctrine as
Pax Liberta

The American Election

Why It's About the War Stupid!

Imperatives of Assault:Legitimacy as Precursor to Sovreignty

The Case for the Bush Doctrine on Iraq

Islam Absolu

Les Débordements du Fondamentalisme Islamique

Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction:National Security Archive Report

American and British intelligence reports on the existence and intended use by Iraq of its WMD program.

Mid-East Backgrounder:Breaking News

U.S.,Israeli,Turkish Agreements on Iraqi Crisis

The Acquisition of Weapons of Mass Destruction:

An Unclassified CIA Report

Operation Defensive Shield-The Legality of Armed Response

The Case for Israel in International Law

Un Ami d'Israël

Dix Declarations d'Amitiés

The Politics of a Guaranteed Income:

The Tragedy of Unfulfilled Promise

Health Care: The Test of our National Consensus

The Untouchable Universal

The Passion

The Eternal Vessel for the Teaching of Contempt

They Poisoned The Wells:The Old/New Anti-Semitism

Exclusiveness and Intolerance in the Post-9/11 World

The Hype of the Hypocrites:

The Reality of the
Political Man

Ten Days That Sear Our Souls

Wallenberg, King and Auschwitz

8 May 1945

A Personal Reflection on Memory and Witness

The Man Who Would Not Be Silenced

The Unapologetic Activism of Peter Bergson

Laurier-Dorion

Everybody Take A Valium

Election 2004: The Real Polls On The Ground

34 Key Ridings

2003 Québec Election Special:

Twenty-Two Ridings to Watch

Forge of Fire:Words That Changed The World

Reflections of Transcendant Yearning for Redemptive Change:A Multimedia Presentation

Justice Shalt Thou Pursue

The Institute's Response to a Time of Challenge

 


Misha Wajsman

A Constructive Anger

The Last Angry Man

BPW on the
New 940 Montreal (2008)

The Last Angry Man

BPW on the
New 940 Montreal (2007)

The Last Angry Man

BPW on the
New 940 Montreal (2006)

Brigitte Garceau

Community activism
Political action

Julius Grey

Individual consequence
Individual conscience

Gen. Lewis MacKenzie

Canada's Bold Voice

Nathalie Elgrably

Une nouvelle vision

Pamela Geller
Atlas Shrugs

The Real Deal on a
World at War

Canadian Hero
Robert J. Galbraith

Eyewitness to War

Nazanin Afshin-Jam

Profile in Courage

Toward A Culture of Conviction: A National Agenda of Character and Conscience

Forthcoming Book

Canadian McCarthyism No Holds Barred

BPW and the
Gomery Inquiry

The Fire This Time

Our Not So Gentle Land

A Question of Need

The Necessity of a Canadian Navy

Full Employment in a Free Society

The Challenge of
Our Times

The United Nations

The World's Sword of Damocles

Quebec and the Middle East: Alliances and Antagonisms

Israeli Relations as Framework of Reference

Financement et Flexibilité II

La Gouvernement du Québec et les Programmes Destinés aux Organismes Communautaires, Culturels et Sociaux

 

Archives-The Agenda
Front Page
RFK & PET: Our Beginnings in Advocacy
A Photo Gallery
A Statement of Purpose
Why We Do What We Do
Beryl P. Wajsman, Esq.
Founder and President
Jack Cola
Chairman of Council
Jack Dym
Vice-Chairman of Council
INSTITUTE SCHOLARS
David H. Romano, Ph.D.
Albert A. Zbily, M.A.
A Profile of the Founder and President:
Beryl P. Wajsman,Esq.
ADVISORY COUNCIL
John F. Angus
Corporate Governance and Banking Accountability
Prof. Julius Grey
Constitutional & Charter Rights and Law Reform
Me.Richard J. McConomy
Judicial Affairs and Legislative Initiatives
Prof.Annette Paquot
International Affairs
Maj.-Gen. (ret.) Lewis W. MacKenzie
National Defence and International Military Affairs
Terence J. Corcoran
Public Security
David B. Harris
Domestic and International Intelligence
Patrick Gagnon
National Political Affairs
Ruth Kovac
Municipal Affairs
Dr.André Dascal
National Health Policy
Hal Newman
Health Care and Social Services
Toni Cochand
Poverty and Homelessness
Nino Colavecchio
Multiculturalism
Rev.Darryl G. Gray
Empowerment
Rabbi Yonah Rosner
Inter-Community Religious Affairs
Sharon Freedman,BSW
Patients' Rights and Seniors
Michel A. Bourque
Technology,Development and Privacy
CONSULTATIVE ROUNDTABLE
Francis Bellido,Ph.D.
Prof.Jean-Charles Chebat
Charles S. Coffey
James C. Duff
Louis Lacroix
Richard H. Gimblett, CD, Ph.D.
Cmdr.Charles Rabbat
Shoel Silver
Jonathan I. Wener
Members of the Roundtable are available to meet and advise on specific issues relevant to Institute initiatives and policy.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATES
Robert G. Hest
(New York)
Peter Dimitroff
(Washington, D.C.)
Col. (ret.) Peter W. Reynolds
(London)
Lawrence J. Behar, Esq. (Miami)
Leonard Dykler, MBA
(Paris)
Me.Isabelle Jablonski
(Paris)
Noga Tarnopolsky
(Jerusalem)
David Harel
(Tel Aviv)
 
The articles,studies and publications on this site are not necessarily reflective of the views of all members of the Council, the Roundtable or of our international Associates.

 


Write to us