Institute for Public Affairs of Montreal |
|
“Evidence of Innocence is Irrelevant": The Death Penalty and the Illinois Experiment The Fallibility of<br>Human Judgment |
|
Beryl P. Wajsman | 10 October 2004 |
|
|
"The legislature can't reform it, the lawmakers won't repeal it and I won't stand for it." ~ Gov. George H. Ryan, This past week That month a brave American Governor, George Ryan of Evidence from our own Department of Justice, the John Howard Society and Toronto’s Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted, demonstrates that some of the same issues plague our own overburdened criminal justice system resulting in too many indictments and convictions of the innocent as we have seen in the Truscott, Morin and Campbell cases just to name a few. What was new in the Northwestern study were the percentage of errors, and the instances of abuse, which were higher than ever before imagined. Item 1:Half of some 300 capital cases had been reversed for new trial or sentencing based on new evidence of innocence or abuse of the rights of the accused. Item 2: Two-thirds of the convicted were visible minorities. Item 3: Of these half had been convicted, not by a jury of their peers, but by all-white juries. Item 4: Twenty percent had been represented by lawyers who had been disbarred or at some point suspended from the practice of law. Item 5: Fully one-third had been convicted on the basis of testimony from jailhouse informants who had made prosecutorial deals to reduce their own sentences. And finally, at one stage in the study, it had been uncovered that of the first 13 cases where new evidence showed innocence---12 of those men had already been executed. It is astounding that the United Nations statistics have shown for decades that those nations that have abolished the death penalty have seen rates of violent crime drop dramatically, while those who persist in maintaing it, continue to have abnormally high incidents of violence. The reason is clear. State killing is still killing. And the message it sends out is that life is cheap. Even conservative Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun admitted that, “The death penalty experiment has failed. It is virtually self-evident to me now that no combination of procedural rules or substantive regulations can ever save the death penalty from its inherent constitutional deficiencies.” And crime-busting Mayor Rudy Giuliani added, "It's a phony issue. To pretend the death penalty is going to end crime in the What has always seemed astonishing is that the very same supposedly God fearing people who state that only the Almighty can decide when life begins, that it is so sacrosanct and that the rights of the unborn are to be protected at all costs, are always the first shrill voices one hears demanding the revenge of blood. It is one of life’s more bitter ironies. Gov. Ryan’s courage was commendable. But the struggle continues. A recent American study this past summer showed that 15% of death-row inmates had been found innocent through new evidence within the previous twelve months. Too high a price for the perpetuation of nothing more than a morbid ritual nourishing the vacuous impression of the destruction of evil. The most vital principle is clear. The state can have no legitimate right to destroy something it has not created. In this case life itself. No crime is as grave as collectivist arrogance. Compromise of this principle has always been the precursor for the ultimate imposition of group imperative over individual right. What Camus called “…acts of public premeditation without equivalency…” He concluded, “An execution is not simply death. It is just as different from the privation of life as a concentration camp is from prison. It adds to death a rule, an organization which is itself a source of moral sufferings more terrible than death. Capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders, to which no criminal's deed, however calculated can be compared. Such a monster is not encountered in private life.” Beryl P. Wajsman President |